Sunday, March 27, 2011

When is a photograph pornography?...


Framing Innocence: A Mother's Photographs, a Prosecutor's Zeal, and a Small Town's Response tells the story of...

Cynthia...a passionate photographer, particularly of her favorite subject: Nora. In the years since her daughter's birth, Cynthia had shot, cataloged, and stored in her cramped dining room more than 35,000 pictures. She hoped to someday publish a photojournalistic account of her family's life. But her most ardent mission was to give her daughter a photographic memory of her childhood.

Nora's childhood changed irrevocably one July day when a film-processing lab sent a roll of Cynthia's prints, including snapshots of Nora in the bathtub, to the police. When she had shot them, Cynthia hadn't thought twice about those pictures, which were a sequence of her daughter bathing and rinsing off with a handheld shower sprayer. The police and county prosecutors, however, looked at the pictures and saw a child performing a sexual act. They indicted Cynthia on two felony charges. Soon afterward, Children Services filed child endangerment charges against Cynthia, alleging that Nora was an abused child. Those leaps of the prosecutorial imagination launched Cynthia and her family into a legal ordeal that would consume one and a half years, cost $40,000, and send emotional aftershocks through their lives for a decade.

...When does a photograph of a naked child "cross the line"? What makes a photograph dangerous — the situation in which it is shot or the uses to which it might be put? Does context matter, or is a photograph a world sealed within its thin white frame? Who decides whether a picture is cute or lewd — the parent who shot it, or the prosecutor who has learned to look through the eyes of the perverts he prosecutes?


Framing Innocence

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

When someone dies, they are not the only people who are "out of time"...



My friend's father died today.  Lots of thoughts came to my mind...

In a sense, now, he probably feels alone.  He's not currently in a relationship.  His mother is not alive.

His father's health had been declining.  So, as this outcome was logically expected, it was very tough on my friend.  In our conversations I noticed the pressures he was under.  As much as I could, I tried to be available for him...which, in my opinion, hasn't been enough:  I haven't been able to "help myself", therefore I haven't been able to provide a lot of help to others.  I have been unemployed for over four years, have no transportation, and don't have my own residence.

Before his father died, I asked my friend if he and his parents/father had conversations that needed to be before it's too late to have them...if all that should be said has been.  A lot of those conversations never happen for people.  I have never met my father (Franz Ray).  I have been trying to locate and contact him, and any siblings and other relatives I have.  I fear my father will die before we get to meet and talk...

By their choice, I have estranged relationships with some of my children.  Because I've been told that's what they truly want, I'm OK with that.  There are some members of your family you will never be friends with, and some friends you consider "family".


A few years ago I lost a friend by the name of Wally.  In a very short amount of time, he and I came to be very close.  (We both liked to joke and be silly, and were not "polically correct"...especially to eachother.)  Wally had trouble with alcohol.  We had talked about it...he had been in rehab...lost his job...needed to have a breathalizer installed in his vehicle.  It seemed he drank when he was alone, and lonliness had a lot to do with him drinking, so I had hoped we could find a place together...work together and build a (production) company...get some (radio) gigs.  The booze got to him before I could.

I had a couple of friends who were married.  There were problems in their marriages, and they were able to work through them and stay together.  Something I envy.


Whether you know me or not, this is a message and warning to all:  I don't want anyone to regret when/if they had an opportunity to...interact...with someone, but chose not to because of pride, stubborness, promises/oaths, fear, and other reasons that "prove your point" or causes you to "win the fight/arguement/confrontation".  Is it truly important?  If so, and you can live with your decision for the rest of your life, only you know what's best for you.  If not...if there is any slight chance of doubt...it might/could haunt you for the rest of your life, and that of other members of your family.

I've experienced that a lot of things have been said, but not meant...or, not meant "forever".  Because I have never liked to be picked-on, teased, and "played-with"...I've taken what has been said to me with great seriousness.  Maybe sometimes too serious, but some people joke and "play" too much...they don't know when to stop.  Some have tried to manipulate people (and me) with words and emotions.  So, those experiences has pushed me to the other extreme:  you say it, I tend to respond as it was presented.  I've been told to leave, but when I did, they complained that I left.  It's been said to me, "I will kick your ass"...so, I planned to strike first.  It's been said to me, "I'll kill you"...so, I made plans to do so to them before they do so to me.  She said she wanted a divorce, so I planned for it...and later learned she said it to get a response from me (to get me to "fight" for the marriage...all that did was to confuse me).  I don't believe in supporting stress and "drama" in relationships.

Say what you mean/mean what you say, spend time with those you want to, get to know those you want to know, love (and show love to) those who love you...BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.


Monday, February 7, 2011

The Communicators: Controlling the Internet


Karen Evans, who served as the administrator for E-Government at the Office of Management & Budget from 2003-09, supports the bill.
Timothy Karr provides a contrasting perspective; he is the campaign director at Free Press and explains why he has reservations about the current language in the bill.
Deborah Wheeler, the Assistant Professor of Political Science at the United States Naval Academy, changes focus toward the ongoing conflict North Africa and the Middle East and the role of the Internet in those situations. She conducted field research in several Middle Eastern countries on the use of the Internet and also teaches at American University in Kuwait.



Saturday, January 8, 2011

Slick on the skids


In an effort to help me...and to get me to stop moochin' offa people...my buddy R Dub! asked that I make the following so he could share it on his blog.

National Handwriting Day...write to heroes, members of the military

Pentel is celebrating National Handwriting Day with a new promotion called "Heroes Worth Writing For"...the promotion aims to educate Americans about the importance of the hand-written letter. Pentel of America...encourages Americans to put pen to paper and hand-write a letter expressing their appreciation to our U.S. troops.

National Handwriting Day is...January 23...The "Heroes Worth Writing For" promotion has a dual purpose:

1) It celebrates the importance of handwriting.  For children, learning how to write also helps teach them self-expression.  For adults, even in a world brimming with technology, handwriting remains a primary and very personal communication tool. 

2) It allows us to give back by recognizing and expressing our thanks to the U.S. troops who sacrifice their lives every day for our country. 

"...this is a great way for us to remind Americans about the significance, emotion, and engagement that can be enclosed within a hand-written letter.  Our U.S. troops are definitely noteworthy individuals who deserve to receive our best wishes and thoughts as well as our thanks for their time, dedication and commitment."

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pentel-of-america-celebrates-national-handwriting-day-with-the-heroes-worth-writing-for-promotion-112889369.html

Arizona governor corrected about statements regarding stopping transplants

Transcripts

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES

Aired January 7, 2011 - 22:00   ET

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR:

...Arizona Governor Jan Brewer...

...we invited her on the program. She declined...

...Governor Brewer somehow found time to appear over on FOX News.

During that interview, Governor Brewer downplayed the effectiveness of bone marrow transplants.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, "ON THE RECORD WITH GRETA VAN SUSTEREN")

BREWER: Bone marrow transplants we still cover, if it is a donor given from the -- from the family, meaning that, if your sister would donate the marrow to you, because it's more of a successful rate.

Those that are outside generally, according to our records, we have that 14 bone marrow transplants have been utilized, and 13 of those people did not successfully live long afterwards.

So, you know, these are difficult decisions.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER:
...not true. In a letter to Governor Brewer, Dr. Jeffrey Schriber, who runs Arizona's largest adult bone marrow transplant center, writes: "Our data was virtually identical to the national data, with 42 -- with 42 percent alive and apparently cured of their disease."

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, "ON THE RECORD WITH GRETA VAN SUSTEREN")

BREWER: A lot of transplants are still being provided in the state of Arizona.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST, "ON THE RECORD": By the state of Arizona or privately?

BREWER: By the state of Arizona. The bottom line is, is that we still provide, even with the cuts, heart transplants, liver transplants, kidney transplants, pancreas, and kidney transplants.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER:
...Liver transplants are not fully covered under the new system. The patient who died last week, for instance, was denied funding for a transplant because he had hepatitis C.

...transplant groups say they use outdated, even faulty data.

For instance, lung transplants were cut out entirely because Arizona's version of Medicaid said data showed the surgery did not extend life expectancy. According to USTransplant.org, though, which provides the national report card for all major organ transplants, about 66 percent of patients survive at least three years after having the transplant.

...Representatives at transplant programs at four Arizona hospitals wrote her offering cost-cutting measures.

Democratic state lawmakers have suggested dipping into federal stimulus money, $30 million, they say, but they say Governor Brewer has been vague about how much, if any, of that money is left. Some has already gone to fixing the roof on a rarely-used coliseum.

And enough money has been spent on algae research to fund the transplant program two times over. Five families dropped from the transplant list, they have gotten so fed up, they launched a Web site to show just how much money is out there. They say they have identified $2.1 million for Arizona's portion of the settlement with AIG, $6 million in unclaimed lottery prizes, and get this, $1.25 million left over from a recently canceled project to build a bridge to save 250 squirrels, not people, squirrels.

Earlier, I spoke with Arizona Senate Minority Leader David Schapira. He calls Governor Brewer a one-person death panel, also Douglas Gravagna, who needs a heart transplant, was a candidate under Arizona's Medicaid program until the rules were changed.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Senator-elect Shapira, I mean, the governor has asked for ideas on how to make up the budget shortfall. She now seems sort of open to ideas.

But the governor's spokesperson released a statement yesterday that reads in part -- quote -- "The minority leader has yet to produce a single proposal to resolve Arizona's massive Medicaid deficit, only this empty rhetoric."

Have there been proposals submitted to the governor?

DAVID SCHAPIRA (D), ARIZONA STATE SENATOR-ELECT: Well, I think one thing that is interesting, the governor has a serious timing issue on this issue. And -- and -- and, in this particular case, I'm -- I'm not the minority leader. I won't be until Monday. I'm not even a sworn-in state senator yet. And so, you know, they're coming out criticizing saying that, for the last year, they have been asking me, when the -- the minority leader they may be referring to is someone who passed away actually a few months ago.

I actually, even though I'm not sworn in as minority leader, have already presented multiple proposals to them. And, in fact, our caucus will introduce a bill on Monday that will offer up just one of those many proposal.

COOPER: What are some of the other proposals?

SCHAPIRA: I mean, there's lots of things that we can do. The one that we will be offering up Monday, in Arizona, we have an accounting credit where, for retailers like myself, if you file your sales tax on time, you get basically a gift from the state, saying thank you for filing on time. That's -- that's about $10 million. That would -- about eight times as much as the cost of this transplant program.

COOPER: What about the stimulus funds?

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: Because the governor's office says it's all accounted for. But -- but you think there's another $30 million that could be used for these transplants, right?

SCHAPIRA: Well, the governor has publicly announced all but $30 million of the stimulus money, of -- of how she plans to spend the stimulus money. We did a public records request. And basically she said to us that the $30 million's been spent.

And in the public records request, she kind of generically said, this much money for public safety, this much money for counties and the cities. Those checks haven't been written. And I can't think of -- I can't think of anything more important than -- than restoring funding for these transplants.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1101/07/acd.02.html

Monday, December 20, 2010

Content Protection Retreat 2 Set for XBIZ L.A.

(from Pink Visual)

...a second Content Protection Retreat has been scheduled to take place in Los Angeles on February 6th and 7th...

(said Pink Visual President Allison Vivas)  “Since much of the foundation was already set at the first CPR event, we plan to be able to provide more tools and resources for studios to walk away with...we are also encouraging industry attorneys who are interested in the anti-piracy efforts to attend and hold private attorney-only discussions as a way to introduce more resources and more options to studios.”

The event will be open to 50 studios and will also include a virtual component where up to 20 studios can participate via videoconference. A registration fee will be required for all attendees in order to cover costs, as this is a non-sponsored event. As with the first CPR, all attendees will be screened to ensure there are no conflicts of interest and no media coverage of the event.

“Our goal is to empower studios through knowledge which enables them to implement a successful anti-piracy strategy and therefore make a major impact on piracy within the adult industry by 2012,” Vivas said. “The event will include the information, tools and resources necessary to position studios for a good start, as we know a successful strategy takes time to put into effect.”

The event will end with a cocktail event for both CPR1 and CPR2 attendees to continue to celebrate this important industry movement.

For more information or to request registration information please contact Pink Visual marketing director Lea Busick at lee@pinkvisual.com or at (520)290-0910, ext. 237.