Showing posts with label entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label entertainment. Show all posts

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Music sucks. (Or...is it me?)


Sometimes Google Play gives music for free.  Recently, I've been pondering about what I was given...what I deleted, what I kept...and what, if anything, it says about:
music that has been considered commercially successful...
my personal tastes (versus that of the "masses")...
choices made by artists, and music companies...
the music I have been exposed to, and prefer, causing me to be jaded...

I consider myself to be VERY eclectic.  I like things for the reasons I do, whatever those reasons are.

After downloading and listening to as much as I could tolerate, I deleted albums from:  Sia, Jason Derulo, and Cole Swindell.

I kept:
Brad Paisley ("Moonshine in the Trunk" album)...
Michael Jackson ("Thriller"...I don't love every song, but I do respect the album)...
Foo Fighters ("Saint Cecilia" EP)...
"The Very Best of Grateful Dead" (I like some of their songs)...
"Janis Joplin's Greatest Hits" (I like some)...
and Elvis Presley ("30 #1 Hits"...some of them are fair).

The Electric Light Orchestra are one of the few musical acts I admit to being a favorite of mine.  When I learned of the plans to release the latest album, I expected to pay for it.  After hearing it (courtesy of National Public Radio) before it was available for sale, I intended to purchase the "Bonus Track Version" of the album.  After it became available for sale...I couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger.  Maybe it's because I don't have any disposable income.  It may be because there's only one song I (now) would consider purchasing...IF it were on sale at a discount.  After giving it much consideration, I know there are very few songs I would spend money for at all...

I could be a stingy person.  It could be me being very frugal.  It could be that the way things have been, and are...I don't feel the urgency and need to pay for the product.  I've been known to hover over a jukebox and review every offering before putting money into the machine...or, walking away.  It might be easier for me to put that money into an open instrument case of a street performer...

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Radio NEEDS personality


Throughout my career, I have shared my thoughts regarding radio with those who are involved in broadcasting as well as those who are not.

A five-part column was posted on an industry related website.  I have attempted to edit it to portions I believe are very important to consider.

===================================

One program director, who asked both his name and radio group be withheld “for fear of losing my job”...“We’re told by the group PD that our DJs are merely a bridge between the songs.  I don’t necessarily agree, but if I don’t agree, they’ll find someone else who does.”

http://www.radioinfo.com/2013/01/28/the-state-of-the-disc-jockey/

----------------------------------------------------

"Too many people in this business put music above personality and care nothing about presentation.  Radio is an art..."

Jacobs Media president Fred Jacobs...the “personality” part of other formats are also very important.

“Depending on format, personalities are either #2 or lower, until you come to rock,” where Jacobs notes, there is a tie for first with favorite songs. “They expect a personality component...As we all know, music is available in a variety of different places other than ‘us.’  Often times, proprietary differences come down to everything else and personalities are a big part of that.”

...Jimmy Fink...

“We have to be local...”

A former disc jockey who worked in several Midwest markets and asked not to be identified since he had just lost his job during a budget cut says, “When I was on the air, year after year we began talking less and less because that’s what our PD was ordered to do by those above his pay scale.  Now I fear after spending almost 20 years in radio that I just lost the last job I’ll have in this business.  Being a DJ isn’t the same anymore.  The word ‘personality’ isn’t a part of being a DJ for a large radio group anymore...”

“You can’t throw DJs away.  You have to work on making the disc jockey an attraction.  The history of radio proves that,” says RadioInfo publisher Michael Harrison.  “Just because you immediately assume people have short attention spans, doesn’t mean the DJ doesn’t play a role in holding their attention.  A few well-chosen words, a heavy dose of charisma and a spark of enthusiasm can actually entice a listener to pay their limited attention to an upcoming song that they otherwise might have either burned out on or worse not realize they want to hear.  Personality is not necessarily a tune out.”

Harrison adds...“Music is merely the first layer of a larger cake.  Personality is another important layer of the cake...Disc jockeys can make a difference in the product, if given the opportunity and they can give radio a perceived ‘ownership’ of the music culture as well as a binding tie into the community.  But that requires work – work in the form of directing, coaching, nurturing, scouting and the investment of capital.  Is there anyone with power left in this business who loves radio enough to step up to the plate and do it right?”

{Joel Salkowitz, the president at Sound Ideas Programming Consultants, is also the founder of “Pulse 87.com” and an innovator credited with the creation of “Hot 97” in New York City...}

Says Salkowitz, “Radio is not going away.  There is a slow and steady decline, but there are also more and more choices out there for the listener.  Radio can’t become a jukebox...It shouldn’t always be about the PPMs.”

http://www.radioinfo.com/2013/01/29/the-state-of-the-disc-jockey-part-2/

--------------------------------------------------

...The disc jockey may also be heard in numerous markets too through voice tracking, but you rarely hear their name, and if you do, there may not be personality within the product.

“A lot of that is self-inflicted by these radio companies,” says longtime top 40, rhythmic, and dance programmer Joel Salkowitz.  “Resources are not being put in place to work with and coach DJs.  The personality DJ is fading away, and by no fault of their own.”

“...What we did was talk about what was most meaningful to our audience,” says Salkowitz.  “One of our biggest complaints from listeners in the study, and it wasn’t just limited to any one station, is not telling listeners what song was playing, and not talking about what is important to the listener.  You have to talk about what people are interested in.”

...large companies have it all wrong; they won’t listen to what the listener really wants.

...John “Records” Landecker.

“...The DJ used to be the salesperson’s best friend, because we sold the station and the inventory they brought in...”

“...A DJ is a performer...Anybody can read a liner, but can they sell that liner?...”

Landecker also says some stations and companies have forgotten what is fun for the listener.

“...We have things we have to say, have to read...we’re supposed to make it entertaining.  That’s what we’re here for.”

...Kid Kelly states, a great radio talent can make great radio, if they are motivated and dedicated to the craft.

“...most radio stations would become great again and can return to a time when the host/DJ would be considered an asset and not a cost center, and one of the most essential people in the building...”

“The future is solely up to the radio station owners...”

Michael Harrison...

“...Radio also needs to bring back the local personality and the music director, positions that have disappeared and need to be returned.  How can you do this financially?  Find a way!  Cut at the top if you need to. Use that money to restore a local and human element.  These people — disc jockeys, music directors, program directors — they are doing what truly needs to be done during very tough economic times: giving life and meaning to this medium.  And they are absolutely vital to the success of the property.”

Says Salkowitz, “You need to give people what they are interested in. You have to be creative and take chances.  Unfortunately, some would argue that it’s easier to take the path of least resistance.”

http://www.radioinfo.com/2013/01/30/the-state-of-the-disc-jockey-part-3/

------------------------------------------------------

...“Shotgun” Tom Kelly...

“...radio can’t just be talk.  It has to be music – and it has to be live.  My hope is that we can get people back on the air again who are live and local, and DJs have to get involved locally and with your listeners.  Listeners are your customers.  There is no radio without listeners.”

...Jimmy Fink...

“Local will be the savior of the DJs, because people who listen to the radio want to know what’s happening in their own backyard...Companies will have much more success if listeners can become a part of the show, and feel like they are a part of the show.”

Fink also believes that radio stations that simply become a “jukebox” of music will be disregarded by the listener, because that’s something they can already do themselves.

“What’s the incentive for the listener?” asks Fink.  A computer can generate a playlist, and using algorithms expand on that playlist...the human connection – the DJ...Companies can still be profitable, maybe even more so, by thinking local.”

...Joel Salkowitz.

“The role of the DJ has to change.  The music is important, but the DJ must engage the listener, not just read liners...”

...the future of radio “is solely the decision of the radio station owners.”

RadioInfo publisher Michael Harrison...“You have to give the listener something more than just continuous music, and it needs to be extremely relevant.”

According to Harrison, “Radio has to be an art form – even information radio.  Radio has to evolve but never to the point of being exclusively utilitarian.  If it doesn’t adhere to that fundamental guideline – keep the art and have a heart — it will lose its specific identity to the vast internet and likely become irrelevant.”

...the DJ has been the person to get us to and through work, the creator of interesting fodder at the water cooler, kept us company during the nights and “third shift,” and made the ride on the weekends more bearable.

According to Harrison, the importance of the disc jockey will not fade away...

“...If radio can begin developing, nurturing and encouraging this unique brand of human being – none of these other audio services will be able to dislodge it from its historical and rightful place on the spectrum of media.  I believe the DJ is the crucial component to the survival of music radio – and the survival of music formats on the FM/AM dial is crucial to the continued health of spoken word radio.  We are all in this together. The job ahead is challenging – but quite simply, if it takes saving the world and all the little niche worlds within it, then that is what we must do to save radio.”

...It will also take brave ownership to adapt to the “personality” of radio, and as Kid Kelly says, “allow disc jockeys to come back to what I like to refer to as ‘essential,’ or one of the most essential people in the building.”

According to Kelly, “If you can create compelling, exclusive, unique content – you win.”

http://www.radioinfo.com/2013/02/01/the-state-of-the-disc-jockey-part-5/


Friday, November 16, 2012

Personality radio...where the hell is it?



Here are some items from an article titled "Hot-Rocking, Flame-Throwing Memories".  The article covers radio programming based in personality.  A lot of the points of this article have been lost to radio station ownership and management.  These are things I learned from working (hard) "in the trenches"...

=======================================================

“You never had time to look back or to debate very long on decisions...You had to just go on your ‘gut’ because it was fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants programming.”

“People in modern-day radio over-think programming...”

"...I have never heard a boring air-check of ‘Z100′ in the 1980s.  It was always exciting, compelling, and on the edge.  The whole station lived on the edge.  You never knew when we were going to say something crazy or do something stupid.”

"...we were all on a team.”

“Frankly, many companies don’t want personalities who rise above the others because of budgets...there really doesn’t seem to be much training going on in the business.  There certainly is not as much as there was before.”

"...it is still about passion and excitement...Compelling content is more important than ever because everyone now has the same tools...too many stations sound alike.  Stations have the same information and research.  Many stations around the country even have the same personalities...”

"...teach people to have a flame burning in their soul and to have a passion for what they do..."

“I don’t recognize radio people as personalities hardly at all today.  You are lucky if you are able to say just your name – it is amazing.  In most cases, they have no personality.  It is another flip-card situation.  You can hear how restricted they are.  No one is allowing personality radio.  There is no reason for you to listen to radio unless you can find a personality but there are not many of them...”

“It is not what you say – it is how you say it.  You can choose to do, ‘That was/here is’ – or – you can get something done by saying where the artist is from, or some unique situation about the song.  It is called being knowledgeable.  That is a contribution that makes people want to listen.  Unfortunately though, there is no money for talent in radio anymore.  It is something I would not want to do because of what they pay.  It is ridiculous and so sad.”

"...I am not going to get up to check out a CHR morning show...I don’t hear much other than a syndicated Ryan Seacrest...he is basically doing show business stuff and gossip.  There is nothing about that to make me think, ‘Oh my God, that is a fantastic bit – I have to listen tomorrow’...I have not heard much from the others I have listened to, but then again, I do not expect much.”

http://www.radioinfo.com/2012/11/16/hot-rocking-flame-throwing-memories/

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

book review: Burying Don Imus

Thanks to the University of Minnesota Press for providing a copy of "Burying Don Imus: Anatomy of a Scapegoat".

The author, Michael Awkward, is a professor in the Department of English Language and Literature, at the University of Michigan.

==============================

When I became aware of this book, I was excited to review it. I've been in radio broadcasting since 1979, and somewhat of a fan of Imus.

----------------------------------------------

In the covering paper jacket of the hardback book, is written: "...Awkward privides the first balanced, critical analysis of Imus's comments..."

OK...we'll see...

In the preface: "This book explores why so many...felt that Imus's symbolic burial was utterly necessary.."

In the first chapter is a nice two paragraph setup of the career and caricature (if you will) of Imus. It's probably good that Awkward did that, because some who have attacked Imus didn't understand what he has done, and what he does: the style of his programs which have been very consistent...and acceptable in the past (until being fired from MSNBC).

Throughout the chapter, Awkward does a great job of explaining the tone of the program before Imus was fired. If you don't know where Imus came from, you probably don't understand how he got to where he was/is.

Something arose early in the book that annoyed me. (And I expected it would for the rest of the book.) I believe the fault belongs to the publisher. To access a footnote: I had to go to the rear of the book, locate the "Notes" section, and find the note that relates to the chapter...c'mon! Put footnotes, that relate to the chapter I'm reading, at the end of the chapter they are in.

Awkward states that he does not agree with the explanation Imus gave about why the Rutgers womens basketball team should not be made fun of. I won't try to speak for Awkward...I think it's best that it be read from his book so you can find if you understand, and agree, with his position. Due to my personal morals, I will say that I can somewhat agree with Awkward on this.

I almost want to close my review here. With Awkward stating that the basketball team is "fair game", I think that alone should be enough for a lot of people to want to read the book.

Towards the end of the first chapter, he states: "My intention in the following pages is to continue what Imus...started: to consider his skit in terms of the broad 'conext [of] what happens on this program'...the responses to it...the art of comedy...I hope to demonstrate that the conclusions at which people arrived about the nature of the nappy-headed hos skit reflect a failure to consider the comedic context..."

And that is VERY important. In my professional, and personal, life...many things have not been considered in proper and reasonable context. To attempt to defend against misunderstandings and misinterpretations, effort intensive and time consuming framing has been needed to keep material clearly defined. Which, after doing so, depreciates the worth of the attempt at comedy and/or "the joke". Bad jokes happen. Get over it.

In chapter six, "The Appeal of Imus in the Morning", Awkward states he was never aware of Imus until the show was on MSNBC. (I've known about, and tried to study, Imus since I began my radio career.) Because of what I've read in the chapter, I can say that Awkward "gets it".

Awkward mentions his memoirs, "Scenes of Instruction"...which I believe helped him to be open to understanding the program and those of us who like it. (I haven't read "Scenes of Instruction", but I suspect that when I write my memoirs they'll have a similar tone.)

At the end of the book, some post-MSNBC incidents are noted: a comment Imus made about Adam "Pac Man" Jones, a joke by Bernie Mac (that the audience at a fund-raiser for Barak Obama did not appreciate), and D.L. Hughley agreeing with Imus (about the appearance of the basketball team).

Good book. If you were of the opinion that Imus was evil, is evil, should have been fired, and should not have a stage...this book could cause you to consider how attempts at comedy can be viewed, and what can be considered acceptable behavior and attitudes in certain environments by some.

lots of John Hughes on Encore

From the press release at http://starz.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1000

-----------------------------------------------

...the World Television premiere of Don’t You Forget About Me, a poignant search for Director John Hughes (shot a year before his untimely death) by a group of young filmmakers. The engaging documentary includes appearances by Kevin Smith, Ally Sheedy, Judd Nelson, Andrew McCarthy, Alan Ruck, Kelly LeBrock, Justin Henry, Roger Ebert, Jason Reitman, and Richard Roeper. Don’t You Forget About Me premieres December 25 at 6:40 p.m. and repeats on December 26 at 3:00 p.m.

Big ‘80s Weekend: A totally awesome marathon of ‘80s movies beginning 12/25 at 8:00 p.m.

* · The Breakfast Club
* · Sixteen Candles
* · Weird Science
* · Fletch
* · Back to the Future
* · Lost in America
* · Weekend at Bernie’s
* · Real Genius
* · Revenge of the Nerds II: Nerds in Paradise
* · Parenthood
* · The Legend of Billie Jean
* · Don’t You Forget About Me
* · The Goonies
* · Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure
* · Fast Times at Ridgemont High
* · Porky’s
* · Scarface
* · Creepshow
* · Girls Just Want To Have Fun
* · Vision Quest
* · The Outsiders
* · Wildcats
* · All the Right Moves
* · One Crazy Summer
* · The Blues Brothers
* · Purple Rain